Jorden vores lille planet i kosmos
Global Theosophy

Global Theosophy

*******
En sand esoterisk stjerneport og stargate.
En indgangsport til andre verdener af energi, visdom og medfølelse
(Theos-L Forum - det ældste teosofiske forum på Internettet.)
 


Forside
Artikler
Profil
Links

En privat hjemmeside om
Teosofi, esoterisk visdom og
åndelig udvikling...


Nogle få af de personer bag moderne Planetarisk Teosofi, som jeg er tilknyttet.
Medgrundlægger af moderne Planetarisk Teosofi:
H. P. Blavatsky (1831-91)
Helena P. Blavatsky
Medgrundlægger af moderne Planetarisk Teosofi:
Mahatma Morya (fødsel-?)
Master Morya
Esoterisk Chela af moderne Planetarisk Teosofi:
D. K. Mavalankar (1857-?)
Damodar K. Mavalankar




Growth, Deterioration, and Renewal
(published Aug. 15th 2003 by Morten Nymann)


Real teaching starts with the Guardians, Lords of Knowledge and Understanding. It does not start with Love, Effort or Action, because real love, effort and action are made possible only through real knowledge. But when too many slightly covetous people appear or remain in a community, they turn methods into beliefs, and believe what they should practise.

There are two conditions which can lead to the perishing of a group. In the first, there is too much insincerity in the people in charge. In the other a little insincerity spread among all the members constitutes the equivalent of one or more wholly selfish people.

The insincerity-flaw retards the progress of the leaders and of the others alike. Only searching self-examination can reveal it to them. If it were not for this flaw, they and the community would have arrived at their destination. It is well known, of course, that the worse the degree of selfesteem, the less able is the victim to detect it, or even contemplate it.

To revert to the behaviour of the infected group:
These individuals and their followers choose thoughts and actions which themselves smother most of the hope of success in human fulfilment. They may try to form a permanent organization to aim for enlightenment. They probably subject everyone to the same exercises and observances forgetting the original intention, they turn practises and illustrative tales into a sort of history, which they try to teach. If they posses litterature and contemporary memoires of teachers ('masters'), they use them to bolster a belief in their own rightness and the correctness of their procedures. They frequently use but a single method of interpretation of litterature and tradition, training people and not enabling them to become illuminated.

The Centre has by this stage effectively disappeared. The work has instead become a kind of kingdom, intent upon conserving but not knowing what to conserve. The leaders and their adherents remain frozenly attached to its body, making it a place of imitation which concerves minor or irrelevant outward forms. They generally esteem, under other names, raw emotionality.

Concurrently, there comes into being over-veneration of men, of groups and legend, and hosility towards others, and sometimes impatience. What was originally a unity splits into groups of varying interpretation or concentration, generally useless, and observations which are inaccurate. By this point almost all reality and potentiality have been departed. The community has been effectively invaded and possessed without this development having been registered by its members. The truth may be obscured by the continued use, by the 'lame' community, of words and outward aspects, biographical reminiscenes, and other facets of the original knowledge. Certainly its members will believe that by these tokens they are continuing on the right path.

Their only hope of retrival is in the exercise of concentrated efforts towards sincerity.


This pattern is one reason why from time to time the Guardians must emerge and announce to the possessors of ears the renewal of the high tradition by means of apposite working. By now, naturally, to the strayed ones, these words will sound strange or inimical, like the speech of reason seems to the demented - absurd.

One result of the condition is that without intending it the Guardians incur, variously, both over-enthusiastic support and also opposition to themselves in different sections of their audience. Both reactions are unpromising, if expected, signs, just as objectionable as apathy.

Working togther the parties must overcome these tendencies if success in reviveing the teaching is to be achieved. This is the story of every age upon earth. The only real variant is the timespan during which this behaviour takes place.

Those who have only little knowledge, and think that they have more than that of ordinary folk, are no less open to reason and to teaching than those who have no knowledge at all of the Tradition. This irony is a furhter complication.

And yet they are better able to make progress in the Way once the outer husk of ageing has been softened. They sometimes retain potentialities whose presence involves us in a chance to offer rescue. It is the furtherance of this duty, based upon our knowledge of the Tradition, the teaching and the conditions of parties (groups), that we can exercise skill, action love and effort.
When the husk of people or groupings is too hardened, such individuals and communities will remain like hard nuts which are being rapidly carried down a river, heedlessly.

The water of comparison and understanding will not be able to soften them enough to help them sprout into seedlings before they reach a dam where they pile up, abandoned and, unfortunately, uncomprehending.

by a friend






 
 
Copyright © 2001 | M. Nymann - global-theosophy@stofanet.dk